↓ Skip to main content

Sec61β facilitates the maintenance of endoplasmic reticulum homeostasis by associating microtubules

Overview of attention for article published in Protein & Cell, November 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
25 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
57 Mendeley
Title
Sec61β facilitates the maintenance of endoplasmic reticulum homeostasis by associating microtubules
Published in
Protein & Cell, November 2017
DOI 10.1007/s13238-017-0492-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yimeng Zhu, Gangming Zhang, Shaoyu Lin, Juanming Shi, Hong Zhang, Junjie Hu

Abstract

Sec61β, a subunit of the Sec61 translocon complex, is not essential in yeast and commonly used as a marker of endoplasmic reticulum (ER). In higher eukaryotes, such as Drosophila, deletion of Sec61β causes lethality, but its physiological role is unclear. Here, we show that Sec61β interacts directly with microtubules. Overexpression of Sec61β containing small epitope tags, but not a RFP tag, induces dramatic bundling of the ER and microtubule. A basic region in the cytosolic domain of Sec61β is critical for microtubule association. Depletion of Sec61β induces ER stress in both mammalian cells and Caenorhabditis elegans, and subsequent restoration of ER homeostasis correlates with the microtubule binding ability of Sec61β. Loss of Sec61β causes increased mobility of translocon complexes and reduced level of membrane-bound ribosomes. These results suggest that Sec61β may stabilize protein translocation by linking translocon complex to microtubule and provide insight into the physiological function of ER-microtubule interaction.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 57 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 57 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 21%
Researcher 9 16%
Student > Master 8 14%
Student > Bachelor 6 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 4%
Other 5 9%
Unknown 15 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 15 26%
Neuroscience 8 14%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 12%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 5%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 2 4%
Other 8 14%
Unknown 14 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 December 2017.
All research outputs
#13,901,936
of 23,577,654 outputs
Outputs from Protein & Cell
#413
of 769 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#219,071
of 440,723 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Protein & Cell
#6
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,654 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 769 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.2. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 440,723 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.