↓ Skip to main content

Developing a bacteriophage cocktail for biocontrol of potato bacterial wilt

Overview of attention for article published in Virologica Sinica, November 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
52 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
130 Mendeley
Title
Developing a bacteriophage cocktail for biocontrol of potato bacterial wilt
Published in
Virologica Sinica, November 2017
DOI 10.1007/s12250-017-3987-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Cuihua Wei, Junli Liu, Alice Nyambura Maina, Francis B. Mwaura, Junping Yu, Chenghui Yan, Ruofang Zhang, Hongping Wei

Abstract

Bacterial wilt is a devastating disease of potato and can cause an 80% production loss. To control wilt using bacteriophage therapy, we isolated and characterized twelve lytic bacteriophages from different water sources in Kenya and China. Based on the lytic curves of the phages with the pathogen Ralstonia solanacearum, one optimal bacteriophage cocktail, P1, containing six phage isolations was formulated and used for studying wilt prevention and treatment efficiency in potato plants growing in pots. The preliminary tests showed that the phage cocktail was very effective in preventing potato bacterial wilt by injection of the phages into the plants or decontamination of sterilized soil spiked with R. solanacearum. Eighty percent of potato plants could be protected from the bacterial wilt (caused by R. solanacearum reference strain GIM1.74 and field isolates), and the P1 cocktail could kill 98% of live bacteria spiked in the sterilized soil at one week after spraying. However, the treatment efficiencies of P1 depended on the timing of application of the phages, the susceptibility of the plants to the bacterial wilt, as well as the virulence of the bacteria infected, suggesting that it is important to apply the phage therapy as soon as possible once there are early signs of the bacterial wilt. These results provide the basis for the development of bacteriophagebased biocontrol of potato bacterial wilt as an alternative to the use of antibiotics.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 130 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 130 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 26 20%
Student > Master 23 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 12%
Researcher 11 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 5%
Other 8 6%
Unknown 41 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 39 30%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 22 17%
Immunology and Microbiology 14 11%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 2%
Environmental Science 3 2%
Other 10 8%
Unknown 39 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 December 2017.
All research outputs
#15,483,707
of 23,008,860 outputs
Outputs from Virologica Sinica
#290
of 578 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#184,724
of 294,547 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Virologica Sinica
#8
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,008,860 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 578 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.9. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 294,547 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.