↓ Skip to main content

Anxiety, depression, and pain: differences by primary cancer

Overview of attention for article published in Supportive Care in Cancer, August 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
108 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
133 Mendeley
Title
Anxiety, depression, and pain: differences by primary cancer
Published in
Supportive Care in Cancer, August 2009
DOI 10.1007/s00520-009-0712-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Dena J. Fischer, Dana Villines, Young Ok Kim, Joel B. Epstein, Diana J. Wilkie

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 133 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 2%
Unknown 131 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 22 17%
Other 14 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 10%
Student > Bachelor 12 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 8%
Other 30 23%
Unknown 32 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 42 32%
Nursing and Health Professions 18 14%
Psychology 12 9%
Neuroscience 4 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 3%
Other 18 14%
Unknown 35 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 November 2017.
All research outputs
#7,541,834
of 23,008,860 outputs
Outputs from Supportive Care in Cancer
#1,893
of 4,641 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#37,346
of 109,932 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Supportive Care in Cancer
#4
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,008,860 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,641 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 109,932 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.