↓ Skip to main content

The pathogenesis and treatment of pediatric Henoch–Schönlein purpura nephritis

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical and Experimental Nephrology, October 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (65th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
69 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
93 Mendeley
Title
The pathogenesis and treatment of pediatric Henoch–Schönlein purpura nephritis
Published in
Clinical and Experimental Nephrology, October 2011
DOI 10.1007/s10157-011-0478-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yukihiko Kawasaki

Abstract

Henoch-Schönlein purpura (HSP) is a systemic disorder characterized by leukocytoclastic vasculitis involving the capillaries and the deposition of IgA immune complexes. Renal involvement is the principal cause of morbidity and mortality in children with HSP. Thus, it is important to clarify the onset mechanism of Henoch-Schönlein purpura nephritis (HSPN) and to identify the most appropriate treatment. We herein review the pathogenesis and treatment of HSPN. As to the pathogenesis, several studies suggest that galactose-deficient IgA1 is recognized by anti-glycan antibodies, leading to the formation of circulating immune complexes and their mesangial deposition, thereby inducing renal injury. Aggressive therapies for the treatment of severe HSPN, including multiple drug combination therapy and plasmapheresis, have been shown to be effective in ameliorating proteinuria and histological severity. Nevertheless, detailed investigations of the pathogenesis of HSPN and double-blind randomized control studies on children with HSPN are still necessary.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 93 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 2%
Spain 1 1%
United Kingdom 1 1%
Unknown 89 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 16 17%
Student > Bachelor 12 13%
Other 11 12%
Student > Postgraduate 11 12%
Researcher 7 8%
Other 19 20%
Unknown 17 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 65 70%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 2%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 2%
Unspecified 1 1%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 1%
Other 2 2%
Unknown 20 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 March 2015.
All research outputs
#7,763,891
of 23,849,058 outputs
Outputs from Clinical and Experimental Nephrology
#173
of 769 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#46,145
of 134,560 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical and Experimental Nephrology
#5
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,849,058 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 769 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 134,560 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.