↓ Skip to main content

A framework of connections between soil and people can help improve sustainability of the food system and soil functions

Overview of attention for article published in Ambio, November 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
19 X users
facebook
3 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
41 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
167 Mendeley
Title
A framework of connections between soil and people can help improve sustainability of the food system and soil functions
Published in
Ambio, November 2017
DOI 10.1007/s13280-017-0965-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Bruce C. Ball, Paul R. Hargreaves, Christine A. Watson

Abstract

Globally soil quality and food security continue to decrease indicating that agriculture and the food system need to adapt. Improving connection to the soil by knowledge exchange can help achieve this. We propose a framework of three types of connections that allow the targeting of appropriate messages to different groups of people. Direct connection by, for example, handling soil develops soil awareness for management that can be fostered by farmers joining groups on soil-focused farming such as organic farming or no-till. Indirect connections between soil, food and ecosystem services can inform food choices and environmental awareness in the public and can be promoted by, for example, gardening, education and art. Temporal connection revealed from past usage of soil helps to bring awareness to policy workers of the need for the long-term preservation of soil quality for environmental conservation. The understanding of indirect and temporal connections can be helped by comparing them with the operations of the networks of soil organisms and porosity that sustain soil fertility and soil functions.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 19 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 167 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 167 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 31 19%
Researcher 23 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 7%
Student > Bachelor 8 5%
Other 22 13%
Unknown 54 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 37 22%
Environmental Science 27 16%
Social Sciences 16 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 2%
Psychology 4 2%
Other 17 10%
Unknown 62 37%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 March 2019.
All research outputs
#2,263,254
of 23,008,860 outputs
Outputs from Ambio
#405
of 1,633 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#53,180
of 438,305 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ambio
#9
of 33 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,008,860 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,633 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 438,305 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 33 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.