↓ Skip to main content

Using extended pedigrees to identify novel autism spectrum disorder (ASD) candidate genes

Overview of attention for article published in Human Genetics, November 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
21 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
55 Mendeley
Title
Using extended pedigrees to identify novel autism spectrum disorder (ASD) candidate genes
Published in
Human Genetics, November 2014
DOI 10.1007/s00439-014-1513-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Marc Woodbury-Smith, Andrew D. Paterson, Bhooma Thiruvahindrapduram, Anath C. Lionel, Christian R. Marshall, Daniele Merico, Bridget A. Fernandez, Eric Duku, James S. Sutcliffe, Irene O’Conner, Christina Chrysler, Ann Thompson, Barbara Kellam, Kristiina Tammimies, Susan Walker, Ryan K. C. Yuen, Mohammed Uddin, Jennifer L. Howe, Morgan Parlier, Kathy Whitten, Peter Szatmari, Veronica J. Vieland, Joseph Piven, Stephen W. Scherer

Abstract

Copy number variation has emerged as an important cause of phenotypic variation, particularly in relation to some complex disorders. Autism spectrum disorder (ASD) is one such disorder, in which evidence is emerging for an etiological role for some rare penetrant de novo and rare inherited copy number variants (CNVs). De novo variation, however, does not always explain the familial nature of ASD, leaving a gap in our knowledge concerning the heritable genetic causes of this disorder. Extended pedigrees, in which several members have ASD, provide an opportunity to investigate inherited genetic risk factors. In this current study, we recruited 19 extended ASD pedigrees, and, using the Illumina HumanOmni2.5 BeadChip, conducted genome-wide CNV interrogation. We found no definitive evidence of an etiological role for segregating CNVs in these pedigrees, and no evidence that linkage signals in these pedigrees are explained by segregating CNVs. However, a small number of putative de novo variants were transmitted from BAP parents to their ASD offspring, and evidence emerged for a rare duplication CNV at 11p13.3 harboring two putative 'developmental/neuropsychiatric' susceptibility gene(s), GSTP1 and NDUFV1.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 55 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 55 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 11 20%
Student > Master 7 13%
Student > Bachelor 7 13%
Other 6 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 7%
Other 13 24%
Unknown 7 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 12 22%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 20%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 11%
Psychology 6 11%
Computer Science 2 4%
Other 5 9%
Unknown 13 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 December 2014.
All research outputs
#14,557,279
of 23,313,051 outputs
Outputs from Human Genetics
#2,466
of 2,980 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#195,409
of 364,760 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Human Genetics
#9
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,313,051 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,980 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.3. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 364,760 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.