↓ Skip to main content

Alectinib: A Review of Its Use in Advanced ALK-Rearranged Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Overview of attention for article published in Drugs, November 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
56 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
77 Mendeley
Title
Alectinib: A Review of Its Use in Advanced ALK-Rearranged Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
Published in
Drugs, November 2014
DOI 10.1007/s40265-014-0329-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kate McKeage

Abstract

Alectinib (Alecensa(®)) is a second-generation, orally active, potent and highly selective inhibitor of anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK). Alectinib is approved for the treatment of ALK fusion-gene positive, unresectable, advanced or recurrent non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in Japan, where it has been given orphan drug designation. Approval was based on a phase 1-2 study in ALK inhibitor-naive patients with ALK-rearranged advanced NSCLC who received twice-daily alectinib 300 mg. In the phase 2 portion, 93.5 % of patients achieved an objective response. Treatment response was rapid, with a partial response achieved in two-thirds of patients within 3 weeks (cycle 1). Patient follow-up is ongoing, and after approximately 2 years, 19.6 % of patients had achieved a complete response, and the 2-year progression-free survival rate is 76 %. During treatment with alectinib (median follow-up approximately 8 months), there was no progression of CNS lesions among patients with known CNS metastases at baseline (although prior radiation therapy may have confounded results). In preclinical models, alectinib was active against most ALK fusion-gene mutations related to crizotinib resistance, and preliminary results from clinical trials indicate efficacy in crizotinib-refractory NSCLC. Alectinib was generally well tolerated in clinical trials, and there were no treatment-related grade 4 adverse events or deaths. The most common grade 3 treatment-related adverse events were decreased neutrophil counts and increased creatinine phosphokinase. While more data are needed to confirm the efficacy of alectinib and to evaluate its activity in crizotinib-resistant disease, the drug provides a very promising option for the treatment of ALK-rearranged advanced NSCLC.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 77 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 77 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 14%
Student > Master 10 13%
Student > Bachelor 10 13%
Student > Postgraduate 8 10%
Other 7 9%
Other 15 19%
Unknown 16 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 14 18%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 11 14%
Chemistry 11 14%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 5%
Other 4 5%
Unknown 26 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 November 2022.
All research outputs
#7,041,349
of 23,041,514 outputs
Outputs from Drugs
#1,234
of 3,289 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#98,376
of 363,377 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Drugs
#14
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,041,514 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,289 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 363,377 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.