↓ Skip to main content

Current Management of Vascular Access

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Journal of The American Society of Nephrology, May 2007
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
231 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
158 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
connotea
1 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Current Management of Vascular Access
Published in
Clinical Journal of The American Society of Nephrology, May 2007
DOI 10.2215/cjn.00860207
Pubmed ID
Authors

Michael Allon

Abstract

Optimizing vascular access outcomes remains an ongoing challenge for clinical nephrologists. All other things being equal, fistulas are preferred over grafts, and grafts are preferred over catheters. Mature fistulas have better longevity and require fewer interventions, as compared with mature grafts. The major hurdle to increasing fistula use is the high rate of failure to mature of newly created fistulas. There is a desperate need for enhanced understanding of the mechanisms of failure to mature and the optimal type and timing of interventions to promote maturity. Grafts are prone to frequent stenosis and thrombosis. Surveillance for graft stenosis with preemptive angioplasty may reduce graft thrombosis, but recent randomized clinical trials have questioned the efficacy of this approach. Graft stenosis results from aggressive neointimal hyperplasia, and pharmacologic approaches to slowing this process are being investigated in clinical trials. Catheters are prone to frequent thrombosis and infection. The optimal management of catheter-related bacteremia is a subject of ongoing debate. Prophylaxis of catheter-related bacteremia continues to generate important clinical research. Close collaboration among nephrologists, surgeons, radiologists, and the dialysis staff is required to optimize vascular access outcomes and can be expedited by having a dedicated access coordinator to streamline the process. The goal of this review is to provide an update on the current status of vascular access management.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 158 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 1%
Chile 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 148 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 24 15%
Student > Postgraduate 22 14%
Other 20 13%
Student > Master 15 9%
Student > Bachelor 13 8%
Other 33 21%
Unknown 31 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 96 61%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 4%
Engineering 7 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 3%
Immunology and Microbiology 3 2%
Other 9 6%
Unknown 31 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 January 2017.
All research outputs
#15,169,949
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Journal of The American Society of Nephrology
#3,288
of 4,057 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#70,608
of 83,030 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Journal of The American Society of Nephrology
#14
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,057 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.6. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 83,030 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.