| Title |
Evidence-based conservation: predator-proof bomas protect livestock and lions
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Biodiversity and Conservation, December 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10531-014-0828-x |
| Authors |
Laly L. Lichtenfeld, Charles Trout, Elvis L. Kisimir |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 18 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| South Africa | 3 | 17% |
| Hong Kong | 1 | 6% |
| Spain | 1 | 6% |
| United States | 1 | 6% |
| Italy | 1 | 6% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 6% |
| Tanzania, United Republic of | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 9 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 14 | 78% |
| Scientists | 4 | 22% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 270 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 5 | 2% |
| Netherlands | 2 | <1% |
| United States | 2 | <1% |
| Indonesia | 1 | <1% |
| Kenya | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Botswana | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 256 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 54 | 20% |
| Student > Master | 44 | 16% |
| Researcher | 35 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 30 | 11% |
| Other | 10 | 4% |
| Other | 38 | 14% |
| Unknown | 59 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 99 | 37% |
| Environmental Science | 75 | 28% |
| Social Sciences | 7 | 3% |
| Arts and Humanities | 3 | 1% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 1% |
| Other | 14 | 5% |
| Unknown | 69 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 81. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 February 2023.
All research outputs
#505,228
of 24,674,353 outputs
Outputs from Biodiversity and Conservation
#51
of 2,373 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,135
of 372,039 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biodiversity and Conservation
#1
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,674,353 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,373 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 372,039 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.