↓ Skip to main content

The Mesocolon

Overview of attention for article published in Annals of Surgery, December 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
124 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
54 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The Mesocolon
Published in
Annals of Surgery, December 2014
DOI 10.1097/sla.0000000000000323
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kevin Culligan, Stewart Walsh, Colum Dunne, Michael Walsh, Siobhan Ryan, Fabio Quondamatteo, Peter Dockery, J. Calvin Coffey

Abstract

Colonic mobilization requires separation of mesocolon from underlying fascia. Despite the surgical importance of planes formed by these structures, no study has formally characterized their microscopic features. The aim of this study was to determine the histological and electron microscopic appearance of mesocolon, fascia, and retroperitoneum, prior to and after colonic mobilization.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 54 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 54 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor > Associate Professor 10 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 11%
Researcher 6 11%
Student > Bachelor 5 9%
Other 4 7%
Other 12 22%
Unknown 11 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 27 50%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 2%
Unspecified 1 2%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 2%
Other 3 6%
Unknown 18 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 August 2015.
All research outputs
#7,960,512
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Surgery
#4,519
of 9,045 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#102,586
of 369,146 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Surgery
#54
of 111 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,045 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.4. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 369,146 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 111 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.