↓ Skip to main content

Mutations of early neurogenesis inDrosophila

Overview of attention for article published in Development Genes and Evolution, July 1981
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
108 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
21 Mendeley
Title
Mutations of early neurogenesis inDrosophila
Published in
Development Genes and Evolution, July 1981
DOI 10.1007/bf00848307
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ruth Lehmann, Ursula Dietrich, F. Jiménez, J. A. Campos-Ortega

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 21 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 21 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 24%
Professor 3 14%
Student > Bachelor 3 14%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 2 10%
Researcher 2 10%
Other 1 5%
Unknown 5 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 38%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 24%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 5%
Mathematics 1 5%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 5%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 5 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 October 2022.
All research outputs
#8,759,452
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Development Genes and Evolution
#164
of 519 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,891
of 6,843 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Development Genes and Evolution
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 519 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.5. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 6,843 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them