↓ Skip to main content

Dummy-surface molecularly imprinted polymers as a sorbent of micro-solid-phase extraction combined with dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction for determination of five 2-phenylpropionic acid…

Overview of attention for article published in Analytical & Bioanalytical Chemistry, November 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (58th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
19 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
42 Mendeley
Title
Dummy-surface molecularly imprinted polymers as a sorbent of micro-solid-phase extraction combined with dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction for determination of five 2-phenylpropionic acid NSAIDs in aquatic environmental samples
Published in
Analytical & Bioanalytical Chemistry, November 2017
DOI 10.1007/s00216-017-0727-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ping Guo, Xucan Yuan, Jingjing Zhang, Binjie Wang, Xiaoyang Sun, Xiaohui Chen, Longshan Zhao

Abstract

A highly binding dummy template surface of molecularly imprinted polymers (MWNTs-MIPs) was synthesized on multi-walled carbon nanotubes surface using 2-phenylpropionic acid as dummy template, 4-vinylpyridine as the functional monomer, ethylene glycol dimethacrylate as the cross-linker, and DMF as porogen by precipitation polymerization method. MIPs were characterized by FT-IR spectroscopy, scanning electron microscope, thermo-gravimetric analysis, and nitrogen adsorption-desorption experiment. Adsorption and selectivity experiments of MIPs and non-imprinted polymers (NIPs) verified that the MIPs had a good selectivity and adsorption properties for five 2-phenylpropionic acid nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). Imprinted polymer was used as a sorbent material for μSPE in current work and μSPE-DLLME method was selected for pretreatment of water samples. The μSPE-DLLME method was successfully used for the pre-concentration of five non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in different environmental water samples prior to ultra-high performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. Efficiencies of μSPE and DLLME were thoroughly investigated and optimized in this study. The optimal results were obtained by using 3 mL of 1% formic acid-acetonitrile as elution solvent and dichloroethane and acetonitrile as extractant and disperser solvent, respectively. Limits of detection and quantification of five NSAIDs for different water matrices varied from 0.50 to 1.10 ng L(-1) and 0.93 to 2.20 ng L(-1), respectively. Each target analyte had a good linearity in its corresponding concentration range. Enrichment factors of target analytes ranged from 91 to 215. Recoveries of the target analytes were between 72.43 and 113.99% at the concentration levels of 0.02, 0.1, and 0.5 μg L(-1). The developed method was successfully applied to extraction and analysis of NSAIDs in different water samples with satisfactory results which could help us better understand their environmental fate and risk to ecological health. Graphical abstract Dummy-surface molecularly imprinted polymers as a sorbent of micro-solid-phase extraction combined with dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction for determination of five 2-phenylpropionic acid NSAIDs in aquatic environmental samples.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 42 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 42 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 5 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 12%
Student > Bachelor 4 10%
Lecturer 3 7%
Student > Master 3 7%
Other 7 17%
Unknown 15 36%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 10 24%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 7%
Business, Management and Accounting 3 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 2%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 2%
Other 5 12%
Unknown 19 45%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 January 2018.
All research outputs
#16,725,651
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Analytical & Bioanalytical Chemistry
#5,260
of 9,619 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#207,694
of 342,671 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Analytical & Bioanalytical Chemistry
#63
of 175 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,619 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 342,671 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 175 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.