| Title |
Darwinian ‘blind’ hypothesis formation revisited
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Synthese, April 2009
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11229-009-9498-8 |
| Authors |
Maria E. Kronfeldner |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 2 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 35 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Hungary | 1 | 3% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 3% |
| Brazil | 1 | 3% |
| India | 1 | 3% |
| Czechia | 1 | 3% |
| China | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 29 | 83% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 8 | 23% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 20% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 9% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 3 | 9% |
| Other | 6 | 17% |
| Unknown | 4 | 11% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 6 | 17% |
| Philosophy | 5 | 14% |
| Social Sciences | 5 | 14% |
| Computer Science | 4 | 11% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 9% |
| Other | 9 | 26% |
| Unknown | 3 | 9% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 February 2018.
All research outputs
#14,959,314
of 23,008,860 outputs
Outputs from Synthese
#1,458
of 2,486 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#78,935
of 94,020 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Synthese
#12
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,008,860 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,486 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.9. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 94,020 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.