↓ Skip to main content

The prone sleeping position and SIDS. Historical aspects and possible pathomechanisms

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Legal Medicine, November 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
3 X users
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
21 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
49 Mendeley
Title
The prone sleeping position and SIDS. Historical aspects and possible pathomechanisms
Published in
International Journal of Legal Medicine, November 2017
DOI 10.1007/s00414-017-1749-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jan Sperhake, Gerhard Jorch, Thomas Bajanowski

Abstract

The incidence of SIDS decreased during the previous 25 years significantly. This is mainly due to epidemiological research identifying important risk factors such as prone sleeping position and subsequent campaigns to reduce this risk factor.Originally, the prone sleeping position for babies had been strongly recommended in the sixties and seventies despite previous publications pointed to the associated risk. Worldwide, many infants died of SIDS whose deaths could have been avoided. Today, the recommendation that infants should sleep in supine position has been scientifically verified. In supine sleeping position, pathophysiological mechanisms can be avoided which may lead to hypoxia and death in prone position. Such mechanisms could be occlusion of airways (in particularly associated with face-down position), elevated diaphragm, positional cerebral hypoxia caused by constriction of arteries, rebreathing CO2, and overheating.Irrespective of the specific pathomechanism leading to death in individual cases, it has been established that the prone position is the most important risk factor for SIDS and therefore should be incorporated in the definition of the term SIDS.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 49 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 49 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 7 14%
Researcher 5 10%
Other 5 10%
Student > Postgraduate 3 6%
Student > Master 3 6%
Other 8 16%
Unknown 18 37%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 14 29%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 14%
Arts and Humanities 1 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 2%
Computer Science 1 2%
Other 6 12%
Unknown 19 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 January 2023.
All research outputs
#2,192,374
of 23,515,785 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Legal Medicine
#76
of 2,123 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#50,672
of 440,802 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Legal Medicine
#3
of 63 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,515,785 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,123 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 440,802 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 63 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.