↓ Skip to main content

CREBBP and p300 lysine acetyl transferases in the DNA damage response

Overview of attention for article published in Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences, November 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (66th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
85 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
91 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
CREBBP and p300 lysine acetyl transferases in the DNA damage response
Published in
Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences, November 2017
DOI 10.1007/s00018-017-2717-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ilaria Dutto, Claudia Scalera, Ennio Prosperi

Abstract

The CREB-binding protein (CREBBP, or in short CBP) and p300 are lysine (K) acetyl transferases (KAT) belonging to the KAT3 family of proteins known to modify histones, as well as non-histone proteins, thereby regulating chromatin accessibility and transcription. Previous studies have indicated a tumor suppressor function for these enzymes. Recently, they have been found to acetylate key factors involved in DNA replication, and in different DNA repair processes, such as base excision repair, nucleotide excision repair, and non-homologous end joining. The growing list of CBP/p300 substrates now includes factors involved in DNA damage signaling, and in other pathways of the DNA damage response (DDR). This review will focus on the role of CBP and p300 in the acetylation of DDR proteins, and will discuss how this post-translational modification influences their functions at different levels, including catalytic activity, DNA binding, nuclear localization, and protein turnover. In addition, we will exemplify how these functions may be necessary to efficiently coordinate the spatio-temporal response to DNA damage. CBP and p300 may contribute to genome stability by fine-tuning the functions of DNA damage signaling and DNA repair factors, thereby expanding their role as tumor suppressors.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 91 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 91 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 19%
Student > Bachelor 15 16%
Researcher 13 14%
Student > Master 8 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 4%
Other 11 12%
Unknown 23 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 31 34%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 16 18%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 8%
Chemistry 4 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 2%
Other 5 5%
Unknown 26 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 December 2021.
All research outputs
#7,591,533
of 23,794,258 outputs
Outputs from Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences
#1,602
of 4,151 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#146,554
of 442,052 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences
#28
of 55 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,794,258 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,151 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 442,052 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 55 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.