↓ Skip to main content

Prebiotic intake reduces the waking cortisol response and alters emotional bias in healthy volunteers

Overview of attention for article published in Psychopharmacology, December 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#6 of 5,358)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
59 news outlets
blogs
8 blogs
twitter
228 X users
patent
11 patents
facebook
149 Facebook pages
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages
googleplus
17 Google+ users
reddit
2 Redditors
video
5 YouTube creators

Citations

dimensions_citation
373 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
864 Mendeley
Title
Prebiotic intake reduces the waking cortisol response and alters emotional bias in healthy volunteers
Published in
Psychopharmacology, December 2014
DOI 10.1007/s00213-014-3810-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kristin Schmidt, Philip J. Cowen, Catherine J. Harmer, George Tzortzis, Steven Errington, Philip W. J. Burnet

Abstract

There is now compelling evidence for a link between enteric microbiota and brain function. The ingestion of probiotics modulates the processing of information that is strongly linked to anxiety and depression, and influences the neuroendocrine stress response. We have recently demonstrated that prebiotics (soluble fibres that augment the growth of indigenous microbiota) have significant neurobiological effects in rats, but their action in humans has not been reported.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 228 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 864 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 7 <1%
United Kingdom 3 <1%
Brazil 2 <1%
Pakistan 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
New Zealand 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 847 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 165 19%
Student > Master 130 15%
Researcher 101 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 93 11%
Other 49 6%
Other 132 15%
Unknown 194 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 133 15%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 108 13%
Psychology 87 10%
Neuroscience 71 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 70 8%
Other 166 19%
Unknown 229 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 753. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 November 2023.
All research outputs
#26,698
of 25,770,491 outputs
Outputs from Psychopharmacology
#6
of 5,358 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#188
of 370,537 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Psychopharmacology
#1
of 59 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,770,491 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,358 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 370,537 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 59 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.