↓ Skip to main content

Anxiety and Attentional Bias in Preschool-Aged Children: An Eyetracking Study

Overview of attention for article published in Research on Child and Adolescent Psychopathology, December 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
peer_reviews
1 peer review site

Citations

dimensions_citation
31 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
110 Mendeley
Title
Anxiety and Attentional Bias in Preschool-Aged Children: An Eyetracking Study
Published in
Research on Child and Adolescent Psychopathology, December 2014
DOI 10.1007/s10802-014-9962-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Helen F. Dodd, Jennifer L. Hudson, Tracey Williams, Talia Morris, Rebecca S. Lazarus, Yulisha Byrow

Abstract

Extensive research has examined attentional bias for threat in anxious adults and school-aged children but it is unclear when this anxiety-related bias is first established. This study uses eyetracking technology to assess attentional bias in a sample of 83 children aged 3 or 4 years. Of these, 37 (19 female) met criteria for an anxiety disorder and 46 (30 female) did not. Gaze was recorded during a free-viewing task with angry-neutral face pairs presented for 1250 ms. There was no indication of between-group differences in threat bias, with both anxious and non-anxious groups showing vigilance for angry faces as well as longer dwell times to angry over neutral faces. Importantly, however, the anxious participants spent significantly less time looking at the faces overall, when compared to the non-anxious group. The results suggest that both anxious and non-anxious preschool-aged children preferentially attend to threat but that anxious children may be more avoidant of faces than non-anxious children.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 110 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 110 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 27 25%
Researcher 16 15%
Student > Master 14 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 10%
Student > Bachelor 7 6%
Other 20 18%
Unknown 15 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 61 55%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 5%
Engineering 5 5%
Neuroscience 5 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 4%
Other 10 9%
Unknown 20 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 August 2016.
All research outputs
#16,048,009
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Research on Child and Adolescent Psychopathology
#1,289
of 2,047 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#205,580
of 368,864 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Research on Child and Adolescent Psychopathology
#13
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,047 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.5. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 368,864 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.