You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
High risk cohort study for psychiatric disorders in childhood: rationale, design, methods and preliminary results
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research, December 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1002/mpr.1459 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Giovanni Abrahão Salum, Ary Gadelha, Pedro Mario Pan, Tais Silveira Moriyama, Ana Soledade Graeff‐Martins, Ana Carina Tamanaha, Pedro Alvarenga, Fernanda Valle Krieger, Bacy Fleitlich‐Bilyk, Andrea Jackowski, João Ricardo Sato, Elisa Brietzke, Guilherme Vanoni Polanczyk, Helena Brentani, Jair de Jesus Mari, Maria Conceição Do Rosário, Gisele Gus Manfro, Rodrigo Affonseca Bressan, Marcos Tomanik Mercadante, Eurípedes Constantino Miguel, Luis Augusto Rohde |
| Abstract |
The objective of this study is to present the rationale, methods, design and preliminary results from the High Risk Cohort Study for the Development of Childhood Psychiatric Disorders. We describe the sample selection and the components of each phases of the study, its instruments, tasks and procedures. Preliminary results are limited to the baseline phase and encompass: (i) the efficacy of the oversampling procedure used to increase the frequency of both child and family psychopathology; (ii) interrater reliability and (iii) the role of differential participation rate. A total of 9937 children from 57 schools participated in the screening procedures. From those 2512 (random =958; high risk =1554) were further evaluated with diagnostic instruments. The prevalence of any child mental disorder in the random strata and high-risk strata was 19.9% and 29.7%. The oversampling procedure was successful in selecting a sample with higher family rates of any mental disorders according to diagnostic instruments. Interrater reliability (kappa) for the main diagnostic instrument range from 0.72 (hyperkinetic disorders) to 0.84 (emotional disorders). The screening instrument was successful in selecting a sub-sample with "high risk" for developing mental disorders. This study may help advance the field of child psychiatry and ultimately provide useful clinical information. Copyright © 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 50% |
| Canada | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 134 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 132 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 22 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 22 | 16% |
| Researcher | 16 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 7% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 10 | 7% |
| Other | 26 | 19% |
| Unknown | 28 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 38 | 28% |
| Psychology | 28 | 21% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 9 | 7% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 2% |
| Computer Science | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 17 | 13% |
| Unknown | 36 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 December 2014.
All research outputs
#19,303,935
of 24,577,646 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research
#300
of 414 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#258,744
of 371,264 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research
#3
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,577,646 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 414 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.3. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 371,264 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.