↓ Skip to main content

Induction and relaxation of extrafloral nectaries in response to simulated herbivory in young Mallotus japonicus plants

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Plant Research, October 2017
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
33 Mendeley
Title
Induction and relaxation of extrafloral nectaries in response to simulated herbivory in young Mallotus japonicus plants
Published in
Journal of Plant Research, October 2017
DOI 10.1007/s10265-017-0988-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Akira Yamawo, Nobuhiko Suzuki

Abstract

The disadvantage of induced defenses compared with constitutive defenses is the time during which a plant is vulnerable to herbivory before activation. There is obvious importance in determining the costs and benefits of induced defenses. Some plants produce extrafloral nectaries (EFNs), which attract ants that protect against herbivores, and induce EFNs and extrafloral nectar in response to leaf damage. To understand induction of indirect defense by ants, we investigated the induction and relaxation of extrafloral nectar secretion and EFN formation after artificial leaf damage in young Mallotus japonicus. Plants were grown under control or leaf damage conditions a greenhouse or in the field. Following artificial leaf damage, we assessed secretion of extrafloral nectar and the number of ant workers on plants. We measured the number of EFNs on each of seven leaves produced after leaf damage. Extrafloral nectar secretion was induced within 1 day following leaf damage, resulting in the attraction of numerous ant workers, and the extrafloral nectar secretion decreased to initial levels after 7 days. The number of EFNs was largest on the first leaf and smallest on the sixth leaf produced after leaf damage, but the total number of EFNs did not differ between treatments. Thus, M. japonicus rapidly induces extrafloral nectar secretion after leaf damage, followed by relaxation. Furthermore, following induction of EFNs on newly produced leaves, it may decrease the cost of induction by reducing the number of EFNs on leaves produced later.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 33 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 33 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 7 21%
Student > Master 6 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 9%
Researcher 1 3%
Other 4 12%
Unknown 7 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 22 67%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 6%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 1 3%
Unknown 8 24%