↓ Skip to main content

MED20 mutation associated with infantile basal ganglia degeneration and brain atrophy

Overview of attention for article published in European Journal of Pediatrics, December 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (73rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
29 Mendeley
Title
MED20 mutation associated with infantile basal ganglia degeneration and brain atrophy
Published in
European Journal of Pediatrics, December 2014
DOI 10.1007/s00431-014-2463-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Julia Vodopiutz, Maria T. Schmook, Vassiliki Konstantopoulou, Barbara Plecko, Susanne Greber-Platzer, Marc Creus, Rainer Seidl, Andreas R. Janecke

Abstract

Infantile movement disorders are rare and genetically heterogeneous. We set out to identify the disease-causing mutation in siblings with a novel recessive neurodegenerative movement disorder. Genetic linkage analysis and whole-exome sequencing were performed in the original family. A cohort of six unrelated patients were sequenced for further mutations in the identified candidate gene. Pathogenicity of the mutation was evaluated by in silico analyses and by structural modeling. We identified the first and homozygous mutation (p.Gly114Ala) in the Mediator subunit 20 gene (MED20) in siblings presenting with infantile-onset spasticity and childhood-onset dystonia, progressive basal ganglia degeneration, and brain atrophy. Mediator refers to an evolutionarily conserved multi-subunit RNA polymerase II co-regulatory complex. Pathogenicity of the identified missense mutation is suggested by in silico analyses, by structural modeling, and by previous reporting of mutations in four distinct Mediator subunits causing neurodegenerative phenotypes. No further MED20 mutations were detected in this study. Conclusion: We delineate a novel infantile-onset neurodegenerative movement disorder and emphasize the Mediator complex as critical for normal neuronal function. Definitive proof of pathogenicity of the identified MED20 mutation will require confirmation in unrelated patients.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 29 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 29 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 4 14%
Student > Bachelor 3 10%
Professor 3 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 7%
Other 4 14%
Unknown 10 34%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 6 21%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 14%
Neuroscience 3 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 7%
Psychology 2 7%
Other 4 14%
Unknown 8 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 October 2023.
All research outputs
#7,104,999
of 24,696,958 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Pediatrics
#1,442
of 4,169 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#93,573
of 371,727 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Pediatrics
#11
of 42 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,696,958 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,169 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 371,727 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 42 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.