↓ Skip to main content

Breeding of non-bitter cucumbers

Overview of attention for article published in Euphytica, February 1959
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#42 of 1,130)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
patent
1 patent
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
44 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
15 Mendeley
Title
Breeding of non-bitter cucumbers
Published in
Euphytica, February 1959
DOI 10.1007/bf00022084
Authors

J. M. Andeweg, J. W. De Bruyn

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 15 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 7%
Unknown 14 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 3 20%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 13%
Professor 2 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 13%
Student > Bachelor 1 7%
Other 2 13%
Unknown 3 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 53%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 7%
Unknown 4 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 August 2015.
All research outputs
#2,272,667
of 22,772,779 outputs
Outputs from Euphytica
#42
of 1,130 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#88
of 6,288 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Euphytica
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,772,779 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,130 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 6,288 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them