↓ Skip to main content

Conversion of microbial rhodopsins: insights into functionally essential elements and rational protein engineering

Overview of attention for article published in Biophysical Reviews, November 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (68th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
9 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
19 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
60 Mendeley
Title
Conversion of microbial rhodopsins: insights into functionally essential elements and rational protein engineering
Published in
Biophysical Reviews, November 2017
DOI 10.1007/s12551-017-0335-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Akimasa Kaneko, Keiichi Inoue, Keiichi Kojima, Hideki Kandori, Yuki Sudo

Abstract

Technological progress has enabled the successful application of functional conversion to a variety of biological molecules, such as nucleotides and proteins. Such studies have revealed the functionally essential elements of these engineered molecules, which are difficult to characterize at the level of an individual molecule. The functional conversion of biological molecules has also provided a strategy for their rational and atomistic design. The engineered molecules can be used in studies to improve our understanding of their biological functions and to develop protein-based tools. In this review, we introduce the functional conversion of membrane-embedded photoreceptive retinylidene proteins (also called rhodopsins) and discuss these proteins mainly on the basis of results obtained from our own studies. This information provides insights into the molecular mechanism of light-induced protein functions and their use in optogenetics, a technology which involves the use of light to control biological activities.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 60 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 60 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 27%
Student > Master 8 13%
Student > Bachelor 7 12%
Researcher 7 12%
Student > Postgraduate 2 3%
Other 4 7%
Unknown 16 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 18 30%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 18%
Chemistry 8 13%
Neuroscience 5 8%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 2%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 17 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 March 2020.
All research outputs
#6,866,317
of 23,008,860 outputs
Outputs from Biophysical Reviews
#136
of 799 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#134,754
of 438,185 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biophysical Reviews
#8
of 46 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,008,860 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 799 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 438,185 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 46 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.