You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Study of Trans-anal Rectal Foreign Body
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Nihon University Medical Association, January 2008
|
| DOI | 10.4264/numa.67.226 |
| Authors |
Taiki Ono, Kenji Mimatsu, Atsushi Kawasaki, Hisao Kano, Youichi Kuboi, Osamu Aramaki, Takatsugu Oida |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 87 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 12 | 14% |
| San Marino | 1 | 1% |
| United States | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 73 | 84% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 86 | 99% |
| Scientists | 1 | 1% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 72. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 March 2024.
All research outputs
#608,243
of 25,722,279 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Nihon University Medical Association
#2
of 50 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,452
of 170,010 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Nihon University Medical Association
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,722,279 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 50 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.3. This one scored the same or higher as 48 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 170,010 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them