| Title |
Differences in larval dynamics of golden mussel Limnoperna fortunei between dam reservoirs with and without an aeration system
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Landscape and Ecological Engineering, August 2009
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11355-009-0082-7 |
| Authors |
Daisuke Nakano, Takuya Kobayashi, Isamu Sakaguchi |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 39 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 3 | 8% |
| Indonesia | 1 | 3% |
| Czechia | 1 | 3% |
| United States | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 33 | 85% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 11 | 28% |
| Student > Master | 10 | 26% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 8% |
| Other | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 3 | 8% |
| Unknown | 5 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 19 | 49% |
| Environmental Science | 5 | 13% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 3 | 8% |
| Engineering | 3 | 8% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 2 | 5% |
| Unknown | 6 | 15% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 November 2017.
All research outputs
#7,942,395
of 23,911,072 outputs
Outputs from Landscape and Ecological Engineering
#39
of 101 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#39,372
of 115,173 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Landscape and Ecological Engineering
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,911,072 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 101 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.7. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 115,173 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.