↓ Skip to main content

Effects of conspecifics on settling juveniles of the invasive golden mussel, Limnoperna fortunei

Overview of attention for article published in Aquatic Sciences, July 2009
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
20 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
66 Mendeley
Title
Effects of conspecifics on settling juveniles of the invasive golden mussel, Limnoperna fortunei
Published in
Aquatic Sciences, July 2009
DOI 10.1007/s00027-009-0103-5
Authors

Paula Sardiña, Daniel H. Cataldo, Demetrio Boltovskoy

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 66 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Australia 2 3%
Argentina 2 3%
Brazil 1 2%
Malaysia 1 2%
Czechia 1 2%
United States 1 2%
Unknown 58 88%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 22 33%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 18%
Other 5 8%
Student > Postgraduate 5 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 6%
Other 11 17%
Unknown 7 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 38 58%
Environmental Science 14 21%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 2 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 2%
Computer Science 1 2%
Other 2 3%
Unknown 8 12%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 November 2017.
All research outputs
#7,541,834
of 23,008,860 outputs
Outputs from Aquatic Sciences
#165
of 630 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#37,371
of 110,807 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Aquatic Sciences
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,008,860 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 630 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 110,807 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them