↓ Skip to main content

Fever and the use of paracetamol during IL-2-based immunotherapy in metastatic melanoma

Overview of attention for article published in Cancer Immunology, Immunotherapy, December 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
3 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
25 Mendeley
Title
Fever and the use of paracetamol during IL-2-based immunotherapy in metastatic melanoma
Published in
Cancer Immunology, Immunotherapy, December 2014
DOI 10.1007/s00262-014-1637-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Anne Helene Køstner, Mai-Britt Bjørklund Ellegaard, Ib Jarle Christensen, Lars Bastholt, Henrik Schmidt

Abstract

Fever is frequently observed in conjunction with interleukin-2 (IL-2)-based immunotherapy. Traditionally, fever has been regarded as an undesirable side effect and treated with fever-lowering drugs. However, new insights in tumor immunology suggest that elevated temperature may facilitate a more effective antitumor immune response. The purpose of this retrospective study was to examine the potential role of the IL-2-induced fever in melanoma patients treated with or without paracetamol in two consecutive cohorts. One hundred and seventy-nine patients with metastatic melanoma treated with a modified decrescendo regimen of IL-2 and Interferon (IFN) between 2004 and 2010 were retrospectively studied. 87 patients treated before 2007 received paracetamol as part of the treatment schedule, and 92 patients treated after 2007 did not receive paracetamol routinely. Body temperature was analyzed as dichotomized and continuous variables and correlated to objective tumor response and overall survival using logistic regression and Cox proportional hazard analysis. Patients experiencing peak temperature of ≥39.5 °C had a median OS of 15.2 months compared to 8.7 months among patients with lower temperatures (P = 0.01). In the multivariate analysis, peak temperature of ≥39.5 °C (HR 0.53; P = 0.026) and high mean temperature (HR 0.56; P = 0.004) were independent prognostic factors for improved survival. We suggest high fever as a biomarker for improved survival in melanoma patients treated with IL-2/IFN. The routine use of fever-reducing drugs during immunotherapy can therefore be questioned. More studies are needed to evaluate the role of fever and the use of antipyretics during cytokine-based immunotherapy.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 25 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 25 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 5 20%
Student > Bachelor 4 16%
Other 2 8%
Lecturer 2 8%
Student > Master 2 8%
Other 3 12%
Unknown 7 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 7 28%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 12%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 8%
Social Sciences 2 8%
Other 2 8%
Unknown 7 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 January 2018.
All research outputs
#14,718,998
of 23,577,654 outputs
Outputs from Cancer Immunology, Immunotherapy
#2,049
of 2,948 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#195,995
of 365,200 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cancer Immunology, Immunotherapy
#17
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,654 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,948 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.2. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 365,200 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.