↓ Skip to main content

A new measure of multimorbid illness and treatment representations: The example of diabetes and depression

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Affective Disorders, December 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (82nd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
8 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
107 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A new measure of multimorbid illness and treatment representations: The example of diabetes and depression
Published in
Journal of Affective Disorders, December 2014
DOI 10.1016/j.jad.2014.11.050
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jennifer Mc Sharry, Felicity L. Bishop, Rona Moss-Morris, Richard I.G. Holt, Tony Kendrick

Abstract

Depression is two to three times more common in people with diabetes than in the general population. Although multimorbid diabetes and depression is associated with poor health outcome, existing research has focused on patients׳ understanding and management of each condition in isolation. This study describes the development and validation of the Diabetes and Depression Representation and Management Questionnaire (DDRMQ), a measure of understanding, management and medication beliefs in people with diabetes and depression.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 107 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 106 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 17 16%
Researcher 15 14%
Student > Bachelor 15 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 8%
Other 24 22%
Unknown 14 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 31 29%
Medicine and Dentistry 25 23%
Social Sciences 12 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 7%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 3%
Other 11 10%
Unknown 18 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 July 2018.
All research outputs
#2,732,463
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Affective Disorders
#1,766
of 10,146 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#36,820
of 368,295 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Affective Disorders
#32
of 183 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,146 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 368,295 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 183 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.