↓ Skip to main content

Creating a “values” chain for sustainable development in developing nations: where Maslow meets Porter

Overview of attention for article published in Environment, Development and Sustainability, March 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
27 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
158 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Creating a “values” chain for sustainable development in developing nations: where Maslow meets Porter
Published in
Environment, Development and Sustainability, March 2011
DOI 10.1007/s10668-011-9291-y
Authors

Philip R. Walsh

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 158 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 1%
Indonesia 1 <1%
Kenya 1 <1%
Austria 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 151 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 29 18%
Student > Master 26 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 22 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 13 8%
Researcher 12 8%
Other 22 14%
Unknown 34 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Business, Management and Accounting 47 30%
Environmental Science 17 11%
Engineering 15 9%
Social Sciences 13 8%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 7 4%
Other 21 13%
Unknown 38 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 November 2017.
All research outputs
#8,882,501
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Environment, Development and Sustainability
#822
of 1,442 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#46,465
of 124,592 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environment, Development and Sustainability
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,442 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.9. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 124,592 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them