↓ Skip to main content

Toxicogenomics in Drug Discovery and Drug Development: Potential Applications and Future Challenges

Overview of attention for article published in Pharmaceutical Research, July 2006
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
29 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
18 Mendeley
Title
Toxicogenomics in Drug Discovery and Drug Development: Potential Applications and Future Challenges
Published in
Pharmaceutical Research, July 2006
DOI 10.1007/s11095-006-9003-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tin Oo Khor, Sherif Ibrahim, Ah-Ng Tony Kong

Abstract

Despite the massive investments made by pharmaceutical companies on drug research and development, the number of new drug approvals has remained stagnant in the past decades. It is well known that developing safe and effective new drugs is a long, difficult, and expensive process. While the cost of developing new drugs is increasing rapidly, withdrawals of drugs from the marketplace due to adverse drug reactions (ADR) and/or toxicity is increasing concurrently. The recent advent of high-throughput in silico (computer softwares) and in vitro (cell cultures) screenings have somewhat alleviated some, but not all, of these challenges by providing an efficient and effective way for developing safer and better drugs. This emerging technology, known as toxicogenomics, has great potential to facilitate the development of methodologies that could predict the long-term toxic effects of compounds using relatively short-term bioassays. This review is aimed at discussing the potential applications and future challenges of toxicogenomics in drug discovery and drug development.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 18 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 6%
United States 1 6%
Unknown 16 89%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 4 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 22%
Professor 2 11%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 11%
Student > Bachelor 1 6%
Other 2 11%
Unknown 3 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 28%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 17%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 6%
Environmental Science 1 6%
Other 2 11%
Unknown 4 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 December 2014.
All research outputs
#20,245,139
of 22,772,779 outputs
Outputs from Pharmaceutical Research
#2,641
of 2,855 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#63,442
of 65,605 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Pharmaceutical Research
#38
of 39 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,772,779 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,855 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 65,605 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 39 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.