You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Canadian guideline on HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis and nonoccupational postexposure prophylaxis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Canadian Medical Association Journal, November 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1503/cmaj.170494 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Darrell H S Tan, Mark W Hull, Deborah Yoong, Cécile Tremblay, Patrick O'Byrne, Réjean Thomas, Julie Kille, Jean-Guy Baril, Joseph Cox, Pierre Giguere, Marianne Harris, Christine Hughes, Paul MacPherson, Shannon O'Donnell, Joss Reimer, Ameeta Singh, Lisa Barrett, Isaac Bogoch, Jody Jollimore, Gilles Lambert, Bertrand Lebouche, Gila Metz, Tim Rogers, Stephen Shafran |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 48 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 18 | 38% |
| United States | 10 | 21% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 2% |
| France | 1 | 2% |
| Mexico | 1 | 2% |
| Australia | 1 | 2% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 2% |
| Spain | 1 | 2% |
| Brazil | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 12 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 34 | 71% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 9 | 19% |
| Scientists | 5 | 10% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 178 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 178 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 30 | 17% |
| Researcher | 16 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 16 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 15 | 8% |
| Other | 12 | 7% |
| Other | 38 | 21% |
| Unknown | 51 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 47 | 26% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 35 | 20% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 8 | 4% |
| Social Sciences | 6 | 3% |
| Chemistry | 5 | 3% |
| Other | 20 | 11% |
| Unknown | 57 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 129. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 August 2019.
All research outputs
#322,480
of 25,411,814 outputs
Outputs from Canadian Medical Association Journal
#579
of 9,460 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,135
of 447,083 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Canadian Medical Association Journal
#15
of 97 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,411,814 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,460 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 34.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 447,083 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 97 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.