| Title |
Explosive hamstrings-to-quadriceps force ratio of males versus females
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
European Journal of Applied Physiology, December 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00421-014-3063-y |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ricci Hannah, Jonathan P. Folland, Stephanie L. Smith, Claire Minshull |
| Abstract |
Females are known to exhibit a greater risk of ACL injury compared to males. Lower explosive hamstrings-to-quadriceps (H/Q) force ratio in the first 150 ms from activation onset could reflect an impaired capacity for knee joint stabilisation and increased risk of ACL injury. However, the explosive H/Q force ratio has not been compared between the sexes. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 4 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 3 | 75% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 212 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 212 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 32 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 23 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 21 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 11 | 5% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 8 | 4% |
| Other | 26 | 12% |
| Unknown | 91 | 43% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Sports and Recreations | 53 | 25% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 25 | 12% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 22 | 10% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 2% |
| Social Sciences | 4 | 2% |
| Other | 7 | 3% |
| Unknown | 96 | 45% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 March 2015.
All research outputs
#15,169,949
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Applied Physiology
#2,874
of 4,345 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#191,511
of 367,054 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Applied Physiology
#37
of 59 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,345 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.6. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 367,054 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 59 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.