↓ Skip to main content

Molecular dynamics simulation of bacterial flagella

Overview of attention for article published in Biophysical Reviews, November 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (54th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
35 Mendeley
Title
Molecular dynamics simulation of bacterial flagella
Published in
Biophysical Reviews, November 2017
DOI 10.1007/s12551-017-0338-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Akio Kitao, Hiroaki Hata

Abstract

The bacterial flagellum is a biological nanomachine for the locomotion of bacteria, and is seen in organisms like Salmonella and Escherichia coli. The flagellum consists of tens of thousands of protein molecules and more than 30 different kinds of proteins. The basal body of the flagellum contains a protein export apparatus and a rotary motor that is powered by ion motive force across the cytoplasmic membrane. The filament functions as a propeller whose helicity is controlled by the direction of the torque. The hook that connects the motor and filament acts as a universal joint, transmitting torque generated by the motor to different directions. This report describes the use of molecular dynamics to study the bacterial flagellum. Molecular dynamics simulation is a powerful method that permits the investigation, at atomic resolution, of the molecular mechanisms of biomolecular systems containing many proteins and solvent. When applied to the flagellum, these studies successfully unveiled the polymorphic supercoiling and transportation mechanism of the filament, the universal joint mechanism of the hook, the ion transfer mechanism of the motor stator, the flexible nature of the transport apparatus proteins, and activation of proteins involved in chemotaxis.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 35 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 35 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 9 26%
Student > Bachelor 6 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 14%
Researcher 2 6%
Other 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 11 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 17%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 14%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 3 9%
Physics and Astronomy 2 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 3%
Other 4 11%
Unknown 14 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 November 2017.
All research outputs
#14,959,314
of 23,008,860 outputs
Outputs from Biophysical Reviews
#309
of 799 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#251,562
of 438,449 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biophysical Reviews
#20
of 48 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,008,860 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 799 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 438,449 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 48 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.