| Title |
Discordance in diagnosis of osteoporosis using spine and hip bone densitometry
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Endocrine Disorders, March 2005
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1472-6823-5-3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Alireza Moayyeri, Akbar Soltani, Nasibeh Khaleghnejad Tabari, Mohsen Sadatsafavi, Arash Hossein-neghad, Bagher Larijani |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 45 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 45 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 13% |
| Researcher | 5 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 7% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 7% |
| Other | 11 | 24% |
| Unknown | 12 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 22 | 49% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 9% |
| Engineering | 2 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 2% |
| Arts and Humanities | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 2 | 4% |
| Unknown | 13 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 November 2017.
All research outputs
#3,827,035
of 23,008,860 outputs
Outputs from BMC Endocrine Disorders
#105
of 769 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,858
of 59,772 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Endocrine Disorders
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,008,860 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 769 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 59,772 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them