↓ Skip to main content

Decision-making capacity of children and adolescents—suggestions for advancing the concept’s implementation in pediatric healthcare

Overview of attention for article published in European Journal of Pediatrics, November 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#43 of 3,845)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
6 news outlets
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
64 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
94 Mendeley
Title
Decision-making capacity of children and adolescents—suggestions for advancing the concept’s implementation in pediatric healthcare
Published in
European Journal of Pediatrics, November 2014
DOI 10.1007/s00431-014-2462-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Katharina M. Ruhe, Tenzin Wangmo, Domnita O. Badarau, Bernice S. Elger, Felix Niggli

Abstract

Within the frameworks of shared decision-making and participation in healthcare, children's ability to understand and appreciate information pertaining to illness and treatment is important. Physicians are mainly responsible for assessing decision-making capacity (DMC) but may encounter difficulties arising from the limited basis of evidence with regard to this concept in pediatrics. Three issues contributing to this paucity of knowledge on DMC of children can be identified: (1) conceptual blurriness and absence of clear terminology, (2) lack of validated tools to reliably assess DMC in the pediatric population, and (3) a need to include a developmental framework to understand DMC in children and adolescents. The aim of this paper is to examine these three issues and provide practical recommendations to advance the concept and its assessment in pediatrics as a step to ensuring children's developmentally appropriate participation in healthcare. Finally, the paper highlights the ethical dimension of assessing DMC emphasizing the importance of physicians' attitudes for the assessment process. Conclusion: A detailed understanding of DMC is necessary to inform developmentally appropriate participation. In order to achieve this, pediatric practice needs to address challenges that are specific to providing healthcare for children, including conceptual issues, assessment, and aspects of child development.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 94 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 94 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 11 12%
Student > Master 8 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 7%
Student > Bachelor 6 6%
Researcher 6 6%
Other 25 27%
Unknown 31 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 13 14%
Psychology 12 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 10%
Social Sciences 8 9%
Neuroscience 3 3%
Other 12 13%
Unknown 37 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 50. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 September 2022.
All research outputs
#741,921
of 23,408,972 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Pediatrics
#43
of 3,845 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,119
of 365,333 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Pediatrics
#1
of 46 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,408,972 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,845 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 365,333 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 46 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.