You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Stratification by Smoking Status Reveals an Association of CHRNA5-A3-B4 Genotype with Body Mass Index in Never Smokers
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLoS Genetics, December 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pgen.1004799 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Amy E. Taylor, Richard W. Morris, Meg E. Fluharty, Johan H. Bjorngaard, Bjørn Olav Åsvold, Maiken E. Gabrielsen, Archie Campbell, Riccardo Marioni, Meena Kumari, Jenni Hällfors, Satu Männistö, Pedro Marques-Vidal, Marika Kaakinen, Alana Cavadino, Iris Postmus, Lise Lotte N. Husemoen, Tea Skaaby, Tarunveer S. Ahluwalia, Jorien L. Treur, Gonneke Willemsen, Caroline Dale, S. Goya Wannamethee, Jari Lahti, Aarno Palotie, Katri Räikkönen, Aliaksei Kisialiou, Alex McConnachie, Sandosh Padmanabhan, Andrew Wong, Christine Dalgård, Lavinia Paternoster, Yoav Ben-Shlomo, Jessica Tyrrell, John Horwood, David M. Fergusson, Martin A. Kennedy, Tim Frayling, Ellen A. Nohr, Lene Christiansen, Kirsten Ohm Kyvik, Diana Kuh, Graham Watt, Johan Eriksson, Peter H. Whincup, Jacqueline M. Vink, Dorret I. Boomsma, George Davey Smith, Debbie Lawlor, Allan Linneberg, Ian Ford, J. Wouter Jukema, Christine Power, Elina Hyppönen, Marjo-Riitta Jarvelin, Martin Preisig, Katja Borodulin, Jaakko Kaprio, Mika Kivimaki, Blair H. Smith, Caroline Hayward, Pål R. Romundstad, Thorkild I. A. Sørensen, Marcus R. Munafò, Naveed Sattar |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 20 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 6 | 30% |
| Netherlands | 2 | 10% |
| Italy | 1 | 5% |
| Finland | 1 | 5% |
| Australia | 1 | 5% |
| Denmark | 1 | 5% |
| Ireland | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 7 | 35% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 15 | 75% |
| Scientists | 3 | 15% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 10% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 102 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Finland | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 99 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 21 | 21% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 13% |
| Professor | 9 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 7% |
| Other | 22 | 22% |
| Unknown | 22 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 23 | 23% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 16 | 16% |
| Psychology | 8 | 8% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 5% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 5% |
| Other | 22 | 22% |
| Unknown | 23 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 52. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 January 2016.
All research outputs
#830,710
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from PLoS Genetics
#556
of 9,017 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,245
of 372,635 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLoS Genetics
#9
of 213 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,017 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 372,635 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 213 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.