↓ Skip to main content

A tool for simulating and communicating uncertainty when modelling species distributions under future climates

Overview of attention for article published in Ecology and Evolution, December 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
37 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
200 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A tool for simulating and communicating uncertainty when modelling species distributions under future climates
Published in
Ecology and Evolution, December 2014
DOI 10.1002/ece3.1319
Pubmed ID
Authors

Susan F. Gould, Nicholas J. Beeton, Rebecca M. B. Harris, Michael F. Hutchinson, Alex M. Lechner, Luciana L. Porfirio, Brendan G. Mackey

Abstract

Tools for exploring and communicating the impact of uncertainty on spatial prediction are urgently needed, particularly when projecting species distributions to future conditions.We provide a tool for simulating uncertainty, focusing on uncertainty due to data quality. We illustrate the use of the tool using a Tasmanian endemic species as a case study. Our simulations provide probabilistic, spatially explicit illustrations of the impact of uncertainty on model projections. We also illustrate differences in model projections using six different global climate models and two contrasting emissions scenarios.Our case study results illustrate how different sources of uncertainty have different impacts on model output and how the geographic distribution of uncertainty can vary.Synthesis and applications: We provide a conceptual framework for understanding sources of uncertainty based on a review of potential sources of uncertainty in species distribution modelling; a tool for simulating uncertainty in species distribution models; and protocols for dealing with uncertainty due to climate models and emissions scenarios. Our tool provides a step forward in understanding and communicating the impacts of uncertainty on species distribution models under future climates which will be particularly helpful for informing discussions between researchers, policy makers, and conservation practitioners.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 200 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Colombia 2 1%
Australia 2 1%
United Kingdom 2 1%
United States 2 1%
Brazil 2 1%
Germany 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Finland 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Other 4 2%
Unknown 182 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 60 30%
Student > Ph. D. Student 45 23%
Student > Master 19 10%
Student > Bachelor 10 5%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 5%
Other 38 19%
Unknown 19 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 80 40%
Environmental Science 53 27%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 10 5%
Computer Science 5 3%
Social Sciences 4 2%
Other 14 7%
Unknown 34 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 January 2018.
All research outputs
#14,929,728
of 25,392,582 outputs
Outputs from Ecology and Evolution
#5,126
of 8,482 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#188,393
of 368,431 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ecology and Evolution
#46
of 83 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,392,582 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,482 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.0. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 368,431 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 83 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.