↓ Skip to main content

Health Risks of Metals in Contaminated Farmland Soils and Spring Wheat Irrigated with Yellow River Water in Baotou, China

Overview of attention for article published in Bulletin of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology, December 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
39 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
44 Mendeley
Title
Health Risks of Metals in Contaminated Farmland Soils and Spring Wheat Irrigated with Yellow River Water in Baotou, China
Published in
Bulletin of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology, December 2014
DOI 10.1007/s00128-014-1435-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Wantong Si, Jumei Liu, Lu Cai, Haiming Jiang, Chunli Zheng, Xiaoying He, Jianying Wang, Xuefeng Zhang

Abstract

The consumption of water and food crops contaminated with metals is a major food chain route for human exposure. We investigated the health risks of metals in Yellow River (YR) water, farmland soil and spring wheat in the Baotou region, northern China. Data indicated that long-term irrigation with polluted YR water led to metal accumulation in local farmland soil and spring wheat. The consumption of YR water and spring wheat in Baotou region can cause adverse health effects to local people, specifically because of Hg, Pb, and Se in YR water and Cu, Zn, Cd, and Mn in spring wheat. The integrative risk of various metals depends mainly on the spring wheat intake. Current results emphasized the need for routine monitoring and management in order to avoid contamination of YR water and spring wheat from the wastewater irrigation system in Baotou region.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 44 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 44 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 6 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 14%
Student > Master 5 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 9%
Student > Postgraduate 4 9%
Other 6 14%
Unknown 13 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 11 25%
Unspecified 6 14%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 5%
Chemistry 2 5%
Other 6 14%
Unknown 14 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 October 2023.
All research outputs
#7,667,893
of 24,633,436 outputs
Outputs from Bulletin of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology
#797
of 4,172 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#101,468
of 370,343 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Bulletin of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology
#2
of 53 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,633,436 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,172 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 370,343 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 53 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.