↓ Skip to main content

Difference in the size of the placenta and umbilical cord between women with natural pregnancy and those with IVF pregnancy

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics, November 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
20 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
38 Mendeley
Title
Difference in the size of the placenta and umbilical cord between women with natural pregnancy and those with IVF pregnancy
Published in
Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics, November 2017
DOI 10.1007/s10815-017-1084-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Atsushi Yanaihara, Shota Hatakeyama, Shirei Ohgi, Kenichirou Motomura, Ryoma Taniguchi, Aguri Hirano, Shin Takenaka, Takumi Yanaihara

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to compare the sizes of the placenta and umbilical cord in women with natural pregnancy versus those undergoing in vitro fertilization (IVF). Overall, 1610 cases of uncomplicated single pregnancies with vaginal delivery at ≥ 37 weeks of gestation were included in this study. The patients were divided into two groups: natural pregnancy group (n = 1453) and IVF pregnancy not including intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) treatment (n = 157). The groups were compared in terms of gestational week, maternal age, parity, maternal weight gain, prepregnancy maternal BMI, infant weight at birth, infant head circumference, placental weight, cross section of the placenta, cross section of the umbilical cord, insertion site of the umbilical cord, and umbilical cord length. Stepwise selection and multivariate logistic regression were used for statistical analysis to correct the result as an independent factor. There was no difference in the size of the placenta and umbilical cord between women with natural pregnancy and with IVF, but the incidence of velamentous insertion of the cord was significantly increased in women with IVF pregnancy (adjusted odd ratio [AOR] 1.72, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.08-2.72, p = 0.026). Although there is no difference in placental weight and cord size, velamentous insertion of the umbilical cord increases in IVF pregnancy and needs careful observation during the delivery process.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 38 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 38 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 6 16%
Other 5 13%
Student > Bachelor 4 11%
Researcher 3 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 8%
Other 5 13%
Unknown 12 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 14 37%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 18%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 5%
Social Sciences 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 11 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 November 2017.
All research outputs
#16,371,088
of 24,119,703 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics
#963
of 1,697 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#208,406
of 329,356 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics
#22
of 33 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,119,703 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,697 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.8. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 329,356 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 33 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.