↓ Skip to main content

Blood Lead Levels and Potential Risk Factors for Lead Exposures Among South Asians in New York City

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Immigrant and Minority Health, March 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (78th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (81st percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
18 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
61 Mendeley
Title
Blood Lead Levels and Potential Risk Factors for Lead Exposures Among South Asians in New York City
Published in
Journal of Immigrant and Minority Health, March 2016
DOI 10.1007/s10903-016-0403-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Paromita Hore, Munerah S. Ahmed, Slavenka Sedlar, Robert B. Saper, Deborah Nagin, Nancy Clark

Abstract

New York City's South Asian children and pregnant women have a disproportionate burden of elevated blood lead levels. This study is the first to investigate blood lead levels and risk factors for lead exposures among South Asian New Yorkers. A survey and a finger-stick blood lead test using a portable analyzer were administered to 230 South Asian adults and children. Blood lead levels of 5 µg/dL or higher were found in 20 % of the adults and 15 % of the children, as compared to 5 % of adults and 2.5 % of children citywide. Factors associated with elevated blood lead levels were recent repair work at home, not speaking English, Bangladeshi or Indian ethnicity, and occupational risk factors. Public health professional should be aware that South Asians may be at an increased risk for elevated blood lead levels.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 61 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 61 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 6 10%
Student > Bachelor 6 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 8%
Student > Master 5 8%
Other 10 16%
Unknown 24 39%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 12 20%
Medicine and Dentistry 10 16%
Engineering 5 8%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 5%
Psychology 3 5%
Other 7 11%
Unknown 21 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 May 2022.
All research outputs
#4,293,544
of 23,867,274 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Immigrant and Minority Health
#267
of 1,261 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#64,868
of 303,797 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Immigrant and Minority Health
#8
of 43 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,867,274 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,261 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 303,797 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 43 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.