↓ Skip to main content

Role of taurine in neutrophil function

Overview of attention for article published in Folia Pharmacologica Japonica, January 1984
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
3 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Role of taurine in neutrophil function
Published in
Folia Pharmacologica Japonica, January 1984
DOI 10.1254/fpj.84.283
Pubmed ID
Authors

Midori MASUDA, Kazuyoshi HORISAKA, Takemi KOEDA

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 3 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 3 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 3 100%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 67%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 November 2017.
All research outputs
#17,897,982
of 23,008,860 outputs
Outputs from Folia Pharmacologica Japonica
#647
of 793 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#34,917
of 35,966 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Folia Pharmacologica Japonica
#9
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,008,860 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 793 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 35,966 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.