↓ Skip to main content

Substance Use Outcomes Among Homeless Clients with Serious Mental Illness: Comparing Housing First with Treatment First Programs

Overview of attention for article published in Community Mental Health Journal, January 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#12 of 1,389)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
6 news outlets
policy
2 policy sources
twitter
25 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
252 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
271 Mendeley
Title
Substance Use Outcomes Among Homeless Clients with Serious Mental Illness: Comparing Housing First with Treatment First Programs
Published in
Community Mental Health Journal, January 2010
DOI 10.1007/s10597-009-9283-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Deborah K. Padgett, Victoria Stanhope, Ben F. Henwood, Ana Stefancic

Abstract

The Housing First (HF) approach for homeless adults with serious mental illness has gained support as an alternative to the mainstream "Treatment First" (TF) approach. In this study, group differences were assessed using qualitative data from 27 HF and 48 TF clients. Dichotomous variables for substance use and substance abuse treatment utilization were created and examined using bivariate and logistic regression analyses. The HF group had significantly lower rates of substance use and substance abuse treatment utilization; they were also significantly less likely to leave their program. Housing First's positive impact is contrasted with the difficulties Treatment First programs have in retaining clients and helping them avoid substance use and possible relapse.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 25 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 271 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Unknown 266 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 52 19%
Researcher 32 12%
Student > Bachelor 31 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 30 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 23 8%
Other 46 17%
Unknown 57 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 77 28%
Medicine and Dentistry 44 16%
Psychology 37 14%
Nursing and Health Professions 22 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 2%
Other 25 9%
Unknown 61 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 81. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 April 2024.
All research outputs
#534,809
of 25,738,558 outputs
Outputs from Community Mental Health Journal
#12
of 1,389 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,789
of 174,867 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Community Mental Health Journal
#1
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,738,558 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,389 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 174,867 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them