Title |
Patterns of Knowledge and Use of Medicinal Plants in Santiago Camotlán, Oaxaca, Mexico
|
---|---|
Published in |
Economic Botany, July 2017
|
DOI | 10.1007/s12231-017-9384-0 |
Authors |
Mónica Pérez-Nicolás, Heike Vibrans, Angélica Romero-Manzanares, Alfredo Saynes-Vásquez, Mario Luna-Cavazos, María Flores-Cruz, Rafael Lira-Saade |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 54 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 54 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 9 | 17% |
Student > Bachelor | 8 | 15% |
Researcher | 6 | 11% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 9% |
Other | 4 | 7% |
Other | 6 | 11% |
Unknown | 16 | 30% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 16 | 30% |
Environmental Science | 9 | 17% |
Social Sciences | 3 | 6% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 4% |
Computer Science | 2 | 4% |
Other | 4 | 7% |
Unknown | 18 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 November 2017.
All research outputs
#5,911,235
of 23,009,818 outputs
Outputs from Economic Botany
#203
of 848 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#84,970
of 283,527 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Economic Botany
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,009,818 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 848 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 283,527 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them