↓ Skip to main content

Combination HIV Prevention: Significance, Challenges, and Opportunities

Overview of attention for article published in Current HIV/AIDS Reports, October 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#17 of 432)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
policy
2 policy sources
twitter
2 X users
wikipedia
14 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
231 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
294 Mendeley
Title
Combination HIV Prevention: Significance, Challenges, and Opportunities
Published in
Current HIV/AIDS Reports, October 2010
DOI 10.1007/s11904-010-0063-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ann E. Kurth, Connie Celum, Jared M. Baeten, Sten H. Vermund, Judith N. Wasserheit

Abstract

No single HIV prevention strategy will be sufficient to control the HIV pandemic. However, a growing number of interventions have shown promise in partially protecting against HIV transmission and acquisition, including knowledge of HIV serostatus, behavioral risk reduction, condoms, male circumcision, needle exchange, treatment of curable sexually transmitted infections, and use of systemic and topical antiretroviral medications by both HIV-infected and uninfected persons. Designing the optimal package of interventions that matches the epidemiologic profile of a target population, delivering that package at the population level, and evaluating safety, acceptability, coverage, and effectiveness, all involve methodological challenges. Nonetheless, there is an unprecedented opportunity to develop "prevention packages" that combine various arrays of evidence-based strategies, tailored to the needs of diverse subgroups and targeted to achieve high coverage for a measurable reduction in population-level HIV transmission. HIV prevention strategies that combine partially effective interventions should be scaled up and evaluated.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 294 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 7 2%
South Africa 3 1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Indonesia 1 <1%
Unknown 281 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 68 23%
Researcher 36 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 36 12%
Student > Bachelor 24 8%
Student > Postgraduate 17 6%
Other 56 19%
Unknown 57 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 84 29%
Social Sciences 42 14%
Nursing and Health Professions 25 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 17 6%
Immunology and Microbiology 9 3%
Other 43 15%
Unknown 74 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 29. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 September 2021.
All research outputs
#1,140,781
of 22,979,862 outputs
Outputs from Current HIV/AIDS Reports
#17
of 432 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,707
of 99,604 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current HIV/AIDS Reports
#1
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,979,862 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 432 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 99,604 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them