| Title |
Play grounds
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Gambling Studies, March 1995
|
| DOI | 10.1007/bf02283207 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
David Kranes |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 16 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 16 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 19% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 2 | 13% |
| Other | 1 | 6% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 3 | 19% |
| Unknown | 3 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 3 | 19% |
| Psychology | 2 | 13% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 13% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 6% |
| Sports and Recreations | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 4 | 25% |
| Unknown | 3 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 34. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 September 2020.
All research outputs
#1,141,652
of 24,920,664 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Gambling Studies
#70
of 914 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#257
of 23,588 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Gambling Studies
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,920,664 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 914 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 23,588 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them