↓ Skip to main content

Gigantism and Acromegaly Due to Xq26 Microduplications and GPR101 Mutation

Overview of attention for article published in New England Journal of Medicine, December 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
54 news outlets
blogs
6 blogs
twitter
11 X users
patent
4 patents
facebook
71 Facebook pages
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
285 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
213 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Gigantism and Acromegaly Due to Xq26 Microduplications and GPR101 Mutation
Published in
New England Journal of Medicine, December 2014
DOI 10.1056/nejmoa1408028
Pubmed ID
Authors

Giampaolo Trivellin, Adrian F Daly, Fabio R Faucz, Bo Yuan, Liliya Rostomyan, Darwin O Larco, Marie Helene Schernthaner-Reiter, Eva Szarek, Letícia F Leal, Jean-Hubert Caberg, Emilie Castermans, Chiara Villa, Aggeliki Dimopoulos, Prashant Chittiboina, Paraskevi Xekouki, Nalini Shah, Daniel Metzger, Philippe A Lysy, Emanuele Ferrante, Natalia Strebkova, Nadia Mazerkina, Maria Chiara Zatelli, Maya Lodish, Anelia Horvath, Rodrigo Bertollo de Alexandre, Allison D Manning, Isaac Levy, Margaret F Keil, Maria de la Luz Sierra, Leonor Palmeira, Wouter Coppieters, Michel Georges, Luciana A Naves, Mauricette Jamar, Vincent Bours, T John Wu, Catherine S Choong, Jerome Bertherat, Philippe Chanson, Peter Kamenický, William E Farrell, Anne Barlier, Martha Quezado, Ivana Bjelobaba, Stanko S Stojilkovic, Jurgen Wess, Stefano Costanzi, Pengfei Liu, James R Lupski, Albert Beckers, Constantine A Stratakis

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 213 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Finland 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Romania 1 <1%
Unknown 206 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 34 16%
Student > Bachelor 30 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 24 11%
Other 19 9%
Student > Master 18 8%
Other 54 25%
Unknown 34 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 83 39%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 35 16%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 21 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 2%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 5 2%
Other 20 9%
Unknown 44 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 501. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 February 2024.
All research outputs
#52,404
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from New England Journal of Medicine
#1,727
of 32,687 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#441
of 371,794 outputs
Outputs of similar age from New England Journal of Medicine
#13
of 325 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 32,687 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 122.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 371,794 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 325 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.