You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A Portable Matched-Field Processing System Using Passive Acoustic Time Synchronization
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
IEEE Journal of Oceanic Engineering, July 2006
|
| DOI | 10.1109/joe.2006.880431 |
| Authors |
Aaron M. Thode, Peter Gerstoft, William C. Burgess, Karim G. Sabra, Melania Guerra, M. Dale Stokes, Michael Noad, Douglas H. Cato |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 38 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| New Zealand | 1 | 3% |
| Italy | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 36 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 29% |
| Researcher | 10 | 26% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 5 | 13% |
| Unknown | 4 | 11% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 12 | 32% |
| Environmental Science | 6 | 16% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 6 | 16% |
| Engineering | 4 | 11% |
| Computer Science | 3 | 8% |
| Other | 3 | 8% |
| Unknown | 4 | 11% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 November 2017.
All research outputs
#8,535,684
of 25,377,790 outputs
Outputs from IEEE Journal of Oceanic Engineering
#147
of 527 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#30,133
of 88,140 outputs
Outputs of similar age from IEEE Journal of Oceanic Engineering
#1
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,377,790 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 527 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 88,140 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them