↓ Skip to main content

Athabasca Valles, Mars: A Lava-Draped Channel System

Overview of attention for article published in Science, September 2007
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
wikipedia
17 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
153 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
98 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Athabasca Valles, Mars: A Lava-Draped Channel System
Published in
Science, September 2007
DOI 10.1126/science.1143315
Pubmed ID
Authors

W. L. Jaeger, L. P. Keszthelyi, A. S. McEwen, C. M. Dundas, P. S. Russell

Abstract

Athabasca Valles is a young outflow channel system on Mars that may have been carved by catastrophic water floods. However, images acquired by the High-Resolution Imaging Science Experiment camera onboard the Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter spacecraft reveal that Athabasca Valles is now entirely draped by a thin layer of solidified lava-the remnant of a once-swollen river of molten rock. The lava erupted from a fissure, inundated the channels, and drained downstream in geologically recent times. Purported ice features in Athabasca Valles and its distal basin, Cerberus Palus, are actually composed of this lava. Similar volcanic processes may have operated in other ostensibly fluvial channels, which could explain in part why the landers sent to investigate sites of ancient flooding on Mars have predominantly found lava at the surface instead.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 98 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 2%
Germany 1 1%
United Kingdom 1 1%
Italy 1 1%
Japan 1 1%
Canada 1 1%
Unknown 91 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 27 28%
Student > Ph. D. Student 24 24%
Student > Master 12 12%
Student > Bachelor 8 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 7 7%
Other 13 13%
Unknown 7 7%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 59 60%
Physics and Astronomy 14 14%
Environmental Science 5 5%
Engineering 2 2%
Computer Science 2 2%
Other 4 4%
Unknown 12 12%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 February 2023.
All research outputs
#3,042,974
of 23,415,749 outputs
Outputs from Science
#32,682
of 78,518 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,483
of 71,915 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science
#175
of 360 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,415,749 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 78,518 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 63.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 71,915 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 360 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.