↓ Skip to main content

Management of adult patients with phenylketonuria: survey results from 24 countries

Overview of attention for article published in European Journal of Pediatrics, December 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (58th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
33 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
53 Mendeley
Title
Management of adult patients with phenylketonuria: survey results from 24 countries
Published in
European Journal of Pediatrics, December 2014
DOI 10.1007/s00431-014-2458-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Friedrich K. Trefz, Francjan J. van Spronsen, Anita MacDonald, François Feillet, Ania C. Muntau, Amaya Belanger-Quintana, Alberto Burlina, Mübeccel Demirkol, Marcello Giovannini, Christoph Gasteyger

Abstract

Phenylketonuria (PKU) is no longer considered merely a pediatric concern; current guidelines recommend life-long treatment. However, information on the adult PKU patient population is scarce. A survey was initiated on behalf of the European PKU Group (EPG) that focused specifically on early-treated adult patients diagnosed by neonatal screening. The online survey was sent via email to 204 healthcare professionals (HCPs) in 33 countries. Eighty-one HCPs from 24 countries responded. The main findings were that the majority of adult patients with PKU in active follow-up are under 30 years of age and are managed in centers that also treat children. Seventy-eight percent of adult PKU patients in follow-up receive treatment, mainly by diet (71 %), with BH4 treatment rarely used in adulthood. Only 26 % of responding HCPs perform routine neurocognitive testing in all their adult patients. There was little consensus regarding target blood phenylalanine (Phe) concentrations, although the majority of respondents reported that their patients achieved blood Phe concentrations below 1200 μmol/l.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 53 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Denmark 1 2%
Unknown 52 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 19%
Researcher 10 19%
Student > Master 7 13%
Other 5 9%
Student > Bachelor 5 9%
Other 6 11%
Unknown 10 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 17 32%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 21%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 4%
Other 8 15%
Unknown 7 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 May 2015.
All research outputs
#14,590,129
of 24,598,501 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Pediatrics
#2,620
of 4,154 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#187,677
of 370,151 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Pediatrics
#18
of 41 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,598,501 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,154 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.6. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 370,151 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 41 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.