Title |
A National Snapshot of Satisfaction with Breast Cancer Procedures
|
---|---|
Published in |
Annals of Surgical Oncology, December 2014
|
DOI | 10.1245/s10434-014-4246-9 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Dunya M. Atisha, Christel N. Rushing, Gregory P. Samsa, Tracie D. Locklear, Charlie E. Cox, E. Shelley Hwang, Michael R. Zenn, Andrea L. Pusic, Amy P. Abernethy |
Abstract |
Women with early-stage breast cancer face the complex decision to undergo one of three equally effective oncologic surgical strategies: breast-conservation surgery with radiation (BCS), mastectomy, or mastectomy with breast reconstruction. With comparable oncologic outcomes and survival rates, evaluations of satisfaction with these procedures are needed to facilitate the decision-making process and to optimize long-term health. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 3 | 43% |
Canada | 1 | 14% |
Unknown | 3 | 43% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 3 | 43% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 43% |
Scientists | 1 | 14% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 126 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 126 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 16 | 13% |
Student > Master | 15 | 12% |
Student > Bachelor | 12 | 10% |
Other | 11 | 9% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 7% |
Other | 29 | 23% |
Unknown | 34 | 27% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 58 | 46% |
Psychology | 5 | 4% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 4% |
Engineering | 4 | 3% |
Computer Science | 3 | 2% |
Other | 10 | 8% |
Unknown | 41 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 November 2022.
All research outputs
#6,372,357
of 23,072,295 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Surgical Oncology
#2,130
of 6,543 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#87,858
of 362,476 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Surgical Oncology
#20
of 95 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,072,295 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,543 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 362,476 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 95 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.