↓ Skip to main content

Identification of Educational Gaps Among Oncologists Who Manage Patients with Pancreatic Cancer

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Gastrointestinal Cancer, November 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (74th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
10 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
24 Mendeley
Title
Identification of Educational Gaps Among Oncologists Who Manage Patients with Pancreatic Cancer
Published in
Journal of Gastrointestinal Cancer, November 2017
DOI 10.1007/s12029-017-0033-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Justin A. Barnes, Melissa L. Ellis, Sharon Hwang, Joan Emarine, Patti Merwin, Gregory D. Salinas, Benjamin L. Musher

Abstract

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDA) is associated with poor outcomes and presents oncologists with a myriad of clinical challenges. This study was conducted to assess oncologists' practice patterns and to identify the greatest areas of need for future PDA continuing medical education (CME) programs. Case vignettes have been validated as an effective tool to assess how physicians approach and treat a wide array of diseases. In order to assess practice patterns for resectable, locally advanced unresectable, and metastatic PDA, an online case vignette survey was distributed to practicing medical oncologists. Responses from 150 US-practicing oncologists were analyzed, and several key opportunities for future CME programs were identified. For case 1 (patient with resectable PDA), 44% of oncologists did not select an evidence-based adjuvant chemotherapy regimen. For case 2 (patient with locally advanced PDA who develops metastases and neuropathy after first-line nab-paclitaxel/gemcitabine followed by chemoradiation), 57% of oncologists did not select an evidence-based second-line chemotherapy regimen, and 35% selected a regimen containing oxaliplatin, a chemotherapeutic known to cause neuropathy. For case 3 (patient with a pancreatic mass and liver metastases), only 34% of oncologists recommended a biopsy, chest imaging, and liver function tests which should be standard of care assessments with this presentation. For all three cases, clinical trial referral was selected by fewer than 5% of respondents. This study identified appreciable discrepancies between oncologists' recommendations and standard evidence-based guidelines. Well-designed CME programs may help to bridge the educational gaps identified and improve adherence to practice guidelines.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 24 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 24 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 4 17%
Student > Bachelor 4 17%
Student > Master 4 17%
Other 1 4%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 4%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 10 42%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 5 21%
Social Sciences 4 17%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 8%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 4%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 11 46%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 December 2017.
All research outputs
#6,549,765
of 25,775,807 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Gastrointestinal Cancer
#59
of 651 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#115,814
of 449,029 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Gastrointestinal Cancer
#1
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,775,807 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 651 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 449,029 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them